<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: No Criminal Charges in U.S. Attorney Firings</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mainjustice.com/2010/07/21/no-criminal-charges-in-u-s-attorney-firings/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mainjustice.com/2010/07/21/no-criminal-charges-in-u-s-attorney-firings/</link>
	<description>Politics, policy and the law at the U.S. Department of Justice</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 22:26:30 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: After Two-Year Battle, Ex-Gonzales Aide Awarded D.C. Law License &#124; Main Justice</title>
		<link>http://www.mainjustice.com/2010/07/21/no-criminal-charges-in-u-s-attorney-firings/comment-page-1/#comment-20114</link>
		<dc:creator>After Two-Year Battle, Ex-Gonzales Aide Awarded D.C. Law License &#124; Main Justice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2011 22:10:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mainjustice.com/?p=37963#comment-20114</guid>
		<description>[...] broke federal law and hoodwinked Congress and the White House. DOJ special prosecutor Nora Dannehy later determined in June 2010 that criminal charges related to the U.S. Attorney purge should not be [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] broke federal law and hoodwinked Congress and the White House. DOJ special prosecutor Nora Dannehy later determined in June 2010 that criminal charges related to the U.S. Attorney purge should not be [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NYU Legal Forum Spotlights Domestic Corruption Alongside FCPA &#124; Just Anti-Corruption</title>
		<link>http://www.mainjustice.com/2010/07/21/no-criminal-charges-in-u-s-attorney-firings/comment-page-1/#comment-20062</link>
		<dc:creator>NYU Legal Forum Spotlights Domestic Corruption Alongside FCPA &#124; Just Anti-Corruption</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Feb 2011 22:49:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mainjustice.com/?p=37963#comment-20062</guid>
		<description>[...] include former Connecticut Assistant U.S. Attorney Nora Dannehy, the special prosecutor who concluded that the 2006 dismissal of U.S. Attorneys by the George W. Bush administration didn&#8217;t merit [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] include former Connecticut Assistant U.S. Attorney Nora Dannehy, the special prosecutor who concluded that the 2006 dismissal of U.S. Attorneys by the George W. Bush administration didn&#8217;t merit [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bush Officials Ask For Donations to Gonzales Legal Fund &#124; Main Justice</title>
		<link>http://www.mainjustice.com/2010/07/21/no-criminal-charges-in-u-s-attorney-firings/comment-page-1/#comment-19228</link>
		<dc:creator>Bush Officials Ask For Donations to Gonzales Legal Fund &#124; Main Justice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2010 02:30:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mainjustice.com/?p=37963#comment-19228</guid>
		<description>[...] special prosecutor, Nora Dannehy, concluded that although the firings were &#8220;contrary to DOJ principle,&#8221; they did not impede [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] special prosecutor, Nora Dannehy, concluded that although the firings were &#8220;contrary to DOJ principle,&#8221; they did not impede [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Us attorney connecticut</title>
		<link>http://www.mainjustice.com/2010/07/21/no-criminal-charges-in-u-s-attorney-firings/comment-page-1/#comment-19140</link>
		<dc:creator>Us attorney connecticut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Nov 2010 01:36:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mainjustice.com/?p=37963#comment-19140</guid>
		<description>[...] No Criminal Charges in U.S. Attorney Firings &#124; Main Justice 21 Jul 2010. Attorney General Michael Mukasey appointed Dannehy, then-acting U.S. Attorney of Connecticut, in September 2008 as a special prosecutor to No Criminal Charges in U.S. Attorney Firings &#124; Main Justice [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] No Criminal Charges in U.S. Attorney Firings | Main Justice 21 Jul 2010. Attorney General Michael Mukasey appointed Dannehy, then-acting U.S. Attorney of Connecticut, in September 2008 as a special prosecutor to No Criminal Charges in U.S. Attorney Firings | Main Justice [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justice Will Not Pursue Charges In US Attorney Dismissals &#8211; Los Angeles Times &#124; The Fresno News</title>
		<link>http://www.mainjustice.com/2010/07/21/no-criminal-charges-in-u-s-attorney-firings/comment-page-1/#comment-17350</link>
		<dc:creator>Justice Will Not Pursue Charges In US Attorney Dismissals &#8211; Los Angeles Times &#124; The Fresno News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Aug 2010 03:02:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mainjustice.com/?p=37963#comment-17350</guid>
		<description>[...] NM Prosecutor firing was politics, not crimeNewsWest9.comThe BLT: Blog of Legal Times&#160;-Main Justice&#160;-msnbc.comall 372 news [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] NM Prosecutor firing was politics, not crimeNewsWest9.comThe BLT: Blog of Legal Times&nbsp;-Main Justice&nbsp;-msnbc.comall 372 news [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Case Closed on the U.S. Attorney Firings? Really? DOJ’s Political ‘Purge’ and Torture Probers Suppressed Evidence In Connecticut Crime Case &#124; Connecticut Watchdog</title>
		<link>http://www.mainjustice.com/2010/07/21/no-criminal-charges-in-u-s-attorney-firings/comment-page-1/#comment-16208</link>
		<dc:creator>Case Closed on the U.S. Attorney Firings? Really? DOJ’s Political ‘Purge’ and Torture Probers Suppressed Evidence In Connecticut Crime Case &#124; Connecticut Watchdog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 13:43:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mainjustice.com/?p=37963#comment-16208</guid>
		<description>[...] DOJ announced on July 21 that it has “closed the case” on the nine unprecedented mid-term firings because [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] DOJ announced on July 21 that it has “closed the case” on the nine unprecedented mid-term firings because [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Case Closed on the U.S. Attorney Firings? Really? DOJ’s Political ‘Purge’ and Torture Probers Suppressed Evidence In Connecticut Crime Case &#124; Connecticut Watchdog</title>
		<link>http://www.mainjustice.com/2010/07/21/no-criminal-charges-in-u-s-attorney-firings/comment-page-1/#comment-16209</link>
		<dc:creator>Case Closed on the U.S. Attorney Firings? Really? DOJ’s Political ‘Purge’ and Torture Probers Suppressed Evidence In Connecticut Crime Case &#124; Connecticut Watchdog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 13:43:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mainjustice.com/?p=37963#comment-16209</guid>
		<description>[...] DOJ announced on July 21 that it has “closed the case” on the nine unprecedented mid-term firings because [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] DOJ announced on July 21 that it has “closed the case” on the nine unprecedented mid-term firings because [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Fired U.S. Attorney Story. Who Was Zoomin&#8217; Who? - Patriot Radio News</title>
		<link>http://www.mainjustice.com/2010/07/21/no-criminal-charges-in-u-s-attorney-firings/comment-page-1/#comment-15818</link>
		<dc:creator>The Fired U.S. Attorney Story. Who Was Zoomin&#8217; Who? - Patriot Radio News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 14:27:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mainjustice.com/?p=37963#comment-15818</guid>
		<description>[...] http://www.mainjustice.com/2010/07/21/no-criminal-charges-in-u-s-attorney-firings/ In an interview with Main Justice last month, Gonzales said he hoped the investigation would wrap [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://www.mainjustice.com/2010/07/21/no-criminal-charges-in-u-s-attorney-firings/" rel="nofollow">http://www.mainjustice.com/2010/07/21/no-criminal-charges-in-u-s-attorney-firings/</a> In an interview with Main Justice last month, Gonzales said he hoped the investigation would wrap [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bloodthirsty Liberal &#187; Nothing to See Here</title>
		<link>http://www.mainjustice.com/2010/07/21/no-criminal-charges-in-u-s-attorney-firings/comment-page-1/#comment-15804</link>
		<dc:creator>Bloodthirsty Liberal &#187; Nothing to See Here</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 11:53:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mainjustice.com/?p=37963#comment-15804</guid>
		<description>[...] never mind: Justice Department officials said Wednesday that Assistant U.S. Attorney Nora Dannehy has [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] never mind: Justice Department officials said Wednesday that Assistant U.S. Attorney Nora Dannehy has [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lee1947</title>
		<link>http://www.mainjustice.com/2010/07/21/no-criminal-charges-in-u-s-attorney-firings/comment-page-1/#comment-15768</link>
		<dc:creator>lee1947</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 02:23:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mainjustice.com/?p=37963#comment-15768</guid>
		<description>WOW, no charges for NOT breaking the law.  Federal Prosecutors serve at the will of the President.  He appoints and dismisses as he sees fit.  Clinton did almost the same thing and not a word was said.  Read the Constitution of The United States of America, you will be surprises at what you learn.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WOW, no charges for NOT breaking the law.  Federal Prosecutors serve at the will of the President.  He appoints and dismisses as he sees fit.  Clinton did almost the same thing and not a word was said.  Read the Constitution of The United States of America, you will be surprises at what you learn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

