THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 23, 2012
Remember me:
Just Anticorruption
Virginia AG Drops King & Spalding for Its Bailout on DOMA
By David Stout | April 29, 2011 12:10 pm

The decision of King & Spalding to bail out of the controversy surrounding the Defense of Marriage Act continues to have a ripple effect, with Virginia Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli notifying the firm that his office was ending its relationship with it because of the firm’s “obsequious act of weakness.”

On Monday, the firm said it was not going to represent the U.S. House of Representatives after all as Speaker John A. Boehner (R-Ohio) leads a defense of the law, which defines marriage as a union between a man and a woman, following the Obama administration’s decision to no longer defend the law in court.

The firm’s switch immediately triggered the resignation of partner Paul Clement, former Solicitor General (see Main Justice’s account).

In a letter to firm partner Joseph Lynch, which was obtained by The Washington Examiner and also reported on by The Huffington Post on Friday, Cuccinelli said the firm’s change of stance was “such an obsequious act of weakness that I feel compelled to end your legal association with Virginia so that there is no chance that one of my legal clients will be put in the embarrassing and difficult situation like the client you walked away from, the House of Representatives.”

Cuccinelli told Lynch that “your firm utterly lacks” the qualities of commitment, courage, strength and toughness necessary for effective lawyers.

RELATED POSTS:

One Comment

  1. Publius Novus says:

    Well, here’s a new one. First time I’ve ever agreed with something Cuchinelli’s done. Fired the cringing, gutness wonders at K & S. Where did K & S get the idea they could dump a client like that? Definitely not in best traditions of the bar. Atticus Finch would not be proud.

Attorney General Eric Holder pushes back against an aggressive Rep. Raul Labrador at a Feb. 2 House Oversight Committee hearing on the Fast and Furious gun-tracing operation. "What you have just done is disrespectful," Holder told the Idaho Republican.

"The legislative record of these provisions contains no rationale for providing veterans' benefits to opposite-sex spouses of veterans but not to legally married same-sex spouses of veterans." -- Attorney General Eric Holder in a letter to Congress explaining the DOJ's stance on federal benefits to married same-sex military personnel.