Breuer Pushes Congress for ‘Honest Services Fraud’ Replacement
By Christopher M. Matthews | September 28, 2010 2:28 pm

Updated at 3:55 p.m. to include Sen. Leahy’s bill.

Assistant Attorney General Lanny Breuer urged Congress Tuesday to pass legislation to “fill the gap” created by the recent Supreme Court decision that placed new limits on federal prosecutors’ use of the federal honest services fraud statute.

“One of the tools that we have relied upon for more than two decades was significantly eroded as a result of the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Skilling v. United States,” Breuer said during a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing.

Later on Tuesday, the committee’s chairman, Sen. Patrick Leahy, introduced legislation along the lines advocated by the Justice Department.

Prosecutors have aggressively used the 1988 federal fraud statute for the past 20 years to go after local and state politicians for graft and corporate executives for bilking their companies.

In June, the Supreme Court found that a section of the law making it a crime to deprive others “of the intangible right of honest services” was unconstitutionally vague.

The court ruled the honest services law is limited to bribery and kickback schemes, and it questioned the convictions of several high-profile defendants including former Enron chief Jeffrey Skilling and former Canadian newspaper mogul Conrad Black.

“Because Skilling’s alleged misconduct entailed no bribe or kickback,” the court said in a majority opinion authored by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, “it does not fall within the Court’s” reading of the law.

Breuer, who leads the Justice Department’s Criminal Division, said the decision all but eliminated the department’s ability to prosecute undisclosed self-dealing by public officials. He provided an example of a local health official who refered disabled citizens to housing facility in which the official had a concealed ownership interest.

“This undisclosed self-dealing or concealed conflict of interest is not bribery, but is just as violative of the public trust,” Breuer said.

Breuer said that it was imperative that Congress act quickly to create a law that would allow the Justice Department to prosecute such behavior using using federal mail and wire fraud statutes.

Sen. Jeff Sessions, the ranking Republican on the panel, expressed some concern about writing a law that did not clearly define “undisclosed self-dealing.”

“Undisclosed self-dealing , that’s a pretty broad statute, it really is,” said Sessions. “Give me a break.”

Sessions expressed concern that federal prosecutors would use a vague or ambiguous law to pursue crimes on the state and local levels, conduct that Sessions said should not fall under the purview of the federal government.

Sessions outlined a scenario in which a local official was prosecuted using federal mail and wire fraud statutes for forgetting to disclose an interest in a dividend fund and then voting on proposed legislation that might affect his interest in the fund.

Breuer assured Sessions that such behavior would not be prosecuted. He said that  Justice Department had created a set of proposed principles for any new law, which would impose a strict burden of proof.

“We’re not going to prosecute the mere failure to disclose,” Breuer said. “What we will prosecute is if a person does not disclose and that official knew he or she had to disclose. We will then look at whether there was scheme or artifice to defraud.”

Former Deputy Attorney General George Terwilliger, who also testified during the hearing, said that he agreed with 90 percent of what Breuer said.

“This is certainly is not a partisan issue,” said Terwilliger, now a partner at White & Case LLP. “This is a post-partisan issue, given the level of corruption that exists at every level of government.”

But Terwilliger said that Congress needs to be careful and deliberative in writing new legislation.

“I respectfully suggest the utmost care,” Terwilliger said. “Ambiguous statutes and requirements present enormous problems. They put prosecutors in the position of setting the standards instead of letting the legislature define them.”

Terwilliger said that Congress should undertake a study of the potential effects of any proposed legislation before writing a new law. He also suggested that it might be better to fold any new requirements into federal conflict of interest laws instead of into the mail and wire fraud statutes, to which Sessions expressed support.

Leahy said that he believed it would be possible to quickly produce a piece of bipartisan legislation.

“We must act aggressively but carefully to strengthen our laws to root out the kinds of public corruption that have resulted in convictions of high state officials, members of Congress, and many others,” Leahy said.

Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email

213 Comments

  1. Digg this…

    While checking out DIGG yesterday I found this…

  2. NBA Picks says:

    [...]The information mentioned in the article are some of the best available [...]……

    [...]below you’ll find the link to some sites that we think you should visit[...]……

  3. Great information…

    This is certainly awesome. Another watch this is what subject matter so we are thunderstruck. We are curious about this sort of tasks. So we appreciate yer contribution, and value your precious time inside this. Please keep editing. They may be hugely …

  4. Blogs ou should be reading…

    [...]Here is a Great Blog You Might Find Interesting that we Encourage You[...]……

  5. Cool sites…

    [...]we came across a cool site that you might enjoy. Take a look if you want[...]……

  6. Websites worth visiting…

    [...]here are some links to sites that we link to because we think they are worth visiting[...]……

  7. escape games says:

    Websites you should visit…

    [...]below you’ll find the link to some sites that we think you should visit[...]……

  8. tatuaggi says:

    Sources…

    [...]check below, are some totally unrelated websites to ours, however, they are most trustworthy sources that we use[...]……

  9. plan cul says:

    trackback…

    […] … great article that everyone should read […]…

  10. Cool sites…

    [...]we came across a cool site that you might enjoy. Take a look if you want[...]……

  11. sana pan says:

    Worthy sites…

    [...] Pages of interest we have a link to [...]…

Leave a Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Ernst & Young LLP
Dealing with complex issues of fraud, regulatory compliance and business disputes can detract from efforts to succ... more
Barnes & Thornburg LLP
ANALYSIS: Dodd-Frank Whistleblower Litigation Heating Up more
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
ANALYSIS: Who’s a “Foreign Official”? Supreme Court Could Clarify Key FCPA Term more
Ropes & Gray LLP
ANALYSIS: Smith & Wesson May Establish New Claim for Insufficient Compliance Program. more
Carlton Fields Jorden Burt
ANALYSIS: The Pros and Cons of Client Proffer Letters - Should You Talk to the Government? more
Corrs Chambers Westgarth
ANALYSIS: The UK Looks to Create an Offense of Failing to Prevent Economic Crimes more
Greenberg Traurig LLP
ANALYSIS: Practical Issues in Implementing an FCPA Compliance Program Across Multiple Countries more

LUKE RUSSERT INTERVIEWS MARY JACOBY ABOUT CHRIS CHRISTIE INVESTIGATION: The Main Justice editor in chief appeared on MSNBC to discuss the one-year anniversary of the closings of the George Washington Bridge lanes.

USDOJ: CRIMINAL DIVISION NEWS  
An error has occurred, which probably means the feed is down. Try again later.