Mistrial in Huge FCPA Sting Case After Jury Deadlocks
By Christopher M. Matthews | July 7, 2011 4:33 pm

U.S. District Judge Richard Leon declared a mistrial Thursday in a massive  foreign bribery case after the jury deadlocked.

Four men, Pankesh Patel, Andrew Bigelow, John Benson Weir and Lee Allen Tolleson, were charged in connection with allegations they violated the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act.

The mistrial came after seven days of deliberation and a nearly six-week-long trial that was seen as a test case for the Justice Department’s stringent enforcement of the law, which prohibits bribes to foreign officials to win business.

After several notes from the jury saying that they were incapable of reaching a unanimous decision on any of the charges, Leon declared a mistrial. Prosecutor Joey Lipton said the government would re-try all four defendants.

Twenty-two defense products executives were charged in 16 sealed indictments filed in December 2009 with violating and conspiring to violate the FCPA as well as conspiracy to launder money. Leon had thrown out the money laundering charges.

The indictments were unsealed in January 2010 after the arrests of all but one of the defendants in a dramatic roundup at a gun show in Las Vegas. The defendants have since been broken into four separate trial groups, and defendants Patel, Bigelow, Weir and Tolleson make up the first group.

The case is the culmination of a two and half year sting operation in which FBI agents, in coordination with an industry executive turned informant , posed as representatives of Gabon, allegedly soliciting $1.5 million in bribes for a fictitious $15 million deal to supply the Ministry of Defense. Actual representatives of Gabon were not involved in the deal.

The sting marked the first wide-scale use of aggressive investigative techniques like wiretaps and informants in an FCPA case and coincides with the department’s expansion of its FCPA enforcement regime.

A spokeswoman for the Justice Department said the prosecution was grateful for the jury’s service. Defense attorneys declined to comment.

UPDATED: 8:40 p.m.

Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email

Comments are closed.

Ernst & Young LLP
Dealing with complex issues of fraud, regulatory compliance and business disputes can detract from efforts to succ... more
Barnes & Thornburg LLP
ANALYSIS: Does the Supreme Court’s decision in Riley v. California signal the rebirth of the 4th amendment in wh... more
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
ANALYSIS: Shelter from the Coming Storm: Anti-Corruption Compliance in European Public Procurement more
Edwards Wildman
ANALYSIS: Who Owns a Bribe? The Bribed Public Official or the Defrauded State? more
Pepper Hamilton LLP
ANALYSIS: Counsel to the Company - A Framework for Corporate Governance more
Ashurst LLP
ANALYSIS: Bribery and Corruption - Implications for Energy Companies more
Squire Patton Boggs
ANALYSIS: New Guidance Published In The UK On Countering Small Bribes In Business more

IS ERIC HOLDER RACE BAITING? CNN panel debates.


LOCAL UTAH OFFICIALS CRITICIZE DOJ'S INACTION ON CORRUPTION SCANDAL: The influence-buying allegations that led to the arrests of two former Utah Attorneys General touched Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, a Democrat.


HAS FCPA GONE TOO FAR? WSJ MODERATOR ASKS."Why trivialize foreign corruption when no one would trivialize domestic corruption?" Criminal Division Fraud Section Chief Jeff Knox parried at a Wall Street Journal business conference in Washington, D.C.

USDOJ: CRIMINAL DIVISION NEWS  
An error has occurred, which probably means the feed is down. Try again later.