In FCPA Settlement, Diebold Gets a Corporate Monitor Despite Voluntary Disclosure

The high-level and egregious misconduct appears to explain why the Ohio-based maker of ATM machines breaks a four-year streak of relative leniency by the DOJ on corporate monitors.

This story is exclusively for members of the
JUST ANTI-CORRUPTION COMMUNITY
Log-in
E-mail Address or UserName: *
Password: *
Subscribe
Click here to subscribe to
Just Anti-Corruption


For information about pricing, click here.
Ernst & Young LLP
Dealing with complex issues of fraud, regulatory compliance and business disputes can detract from efforts to succ... more
Barnes & Thornburg LLP
ANALYSIS: Conviction of Private Investigators in China Further Complicates Anti-Corruption Compliance Efforts more
Arnall Golden Gregory LLP
ANALYSIS: Costly FCPA Misconceptions more
McGuireWoods LLP
ANALYSIS: The Long Arm of British Anti-Corruption Laws and the Impact on Individual Defendants more
Dentons
ANALYSIS: Conducting Compliance Investigations in China: A New Regulatory Environment more
Zuckerman Spaeder LLP
ANALYSIS: Five Takeaways from the Second Circuit’s Dodd-Frank Decision in Liu v. Siemens more
Dorsey & Whitney LLP
ANALYSIS: Anti-Corruption Campaign in China – Causes of Corruption, and Hope? more

LATEST SPECULATION ABOUT HOLDER'S DEPARTURE:He's always supposed to have one foot out the door.

USDOJ: CRIMINAL DIVISION NEWS  
An error has occurred, which probably means the feed is down. Try again later.